Buckeye State Blog - Blogging in General

Voter Suppression Industry Gears Up For Long Hot Summer

Project Vote — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:33:44 -0700

Cross-posted at Project Vote's blog, Voting Matters

Weekly Voting Rights News Update

Last week, we wrote about how some reporters have stopped playing into the hands of voter suppression operatives and suddenly acted like journalists by actually investigating partisan claims of voter fraud in relation to voter registration drives. Until the Virginia press corps showed how it should be done, this kind of every-day feat of journalism had been as rare as voter fraud itself. But, if this is August of an election year, then this must be voter suppression season.

And the favorite target of cynical and desperate attacks on voter participation are the large scale voter registration drives carried out among traditionally underrepresented populations like African-Americans, Latinos, low-income populations, and young people. True to form, August has been delivering voter suppression shenanigans in spades and with Election Day just 82 days away, we suspect there will be much, much more to come.

Case in point: This week, the Wall Street Journal reports how the large and sustained efforts to get eligible citizens onto the voter rolls in time for Election Day has become "the new battleground" between those that want to create access to voting and those who want to inhibit it.

According to the Journal, "Republicans are moving to examine surges in voter registration in some states," particularly in Pennsylvania and Virginia, despite the fact that election officials in "Virginia and other states say there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud so far."

In a recent training session held by the National Republican Lawyers Association, Foley & Lardner lawyer Cleta Mitchel "warned about what she regards as a long pattern of abuses in registration by groups such as [Project Vote's partner in the largest non-partisan voter registration effort in U.S. history – ed.] Acorn and their Democratic allies." Both ACORN and Project Vote are non-partisan organizations.

"'We're all for getting people involved in the process...and getting them to the polls,'she said in an interview later. 'What we're not for is registering fake people at fake addresses, and creating barriers to trying to identify voter fraud where it exists, which is everywhere. It's a growing problem, because of the professional vote-fraud denier industry.'" (Note to the Journal, if AttorneyGate showed us anything, it was that this type of scurrilous and hyperbolic attack from partisan operatives is far from being a "new" battleground).

The shift in tactics by voter suppression operatives like Ms. Mitchel to include attacks on the carefully-researched studies by respected academics and on the voting rights organizations who disseminate their results as part of a "professional voter-fraud denier industry" is notable. It shows that groups like the NRLA aren’t so much concerned with the integrity of the electoral system as they are in creating an atmosphere conducive to the suppression of currently eligible voters and amenable to the adoption of public policies (such as voter identification, proof of citizenship, strict regulation of voter registration drives, and voter caging) that disenfranchise large segments of the voting population.

Bob Bauer explains it on his blog More Soft Money Hard Law:

"This is a fresh rhetorical tactic in Republican 'anti-fraud' politics. The attack on 'fraud' has always suffered from a severe shortage of evidence. Mitchell solves this problem, after a fashion, by turning the inquiry from the assertion of fraud 'everywhere,' sorely wanting in factual support, to its 'denial.' If widespread fraud is being "denied," by a professional industry that has formed for this purpose, then it is in the nature of "denial" that what is being denied must be true—indisputably true. And 'denial,' after all, is neither intellectually nor morally respectable, devoted as it is to the mendacious assault on a known truth.

Denial, Mitchell says quite explicitly, is no innocent thing, not mere foolishness. It is complicity in the perpetuation of an evil. For if vote fraud is 'a growing problem,' it is so because it has been denied: 'because of the professional vote-fraud denier industry.'

So there it is:

1. We have scant evidence of fraud.

2. We know, however, that it is "everywhere."

3. We know it because it is being "denied," by a professional
industry committed to denial.

4. This denial is causing the problem of fraud to become even
worse."

And, of course, allegations of this "growing problem" can now be tracked at the Republican National Committee’s Web site, according to the Journal. This so-called evidence, based solely on news reports, brings us directly back to last week's blog about reporters lazily running unsubstantiated partisan claims of possible voter fraud based on isolated reports of bad voter registration cards, despite the fact that casting an illegal ballot after falsely registering to vote is difficult to achieve due to the "checks and balances" of voter registration, according to one Virginia election official

"Project Vote's executive director, Michael Slater, acknowledged occasional problems with voter registrations, but said that many are the result of poor record keeping," the Journal reported. "He said a greater risk comes from Republicans' efforts to police rolls."

"'We don't have a real history in the last 10 to 15 years of large-scale voter fraud,'" Slater said. "'What we do have a problem with is getting everyone on the rolls and making sure their votes are counted.'"

A prime example of the kind of problem that will actively disenfranchise potentially hundreds of thousands of eligible voters across the county (as opposed to any problems with any voter registration drive, which have never been shown to result in any fraudulent ballots or voter impersonation cases) is shaping up in Ohio. There, nearly 600,000 eligible voters "are subject to being removed from Ohio's voter registration rolls without notice or a hearing because of the state's vague regulations on vote caging," according to the Advancement Project and Project Vote in a press release Wednesday.

The state's recently implemented law "requires boards of election to send voter information mailings and amends Ohio's challenge statutes," the release said. "It enables a practice called voter caging, wherein voters can be purged from the rolls if they have problems with their mail." However, these "problems" could be the result of a number of database errors, errors in the mailing labels or poor matching criteria, notes Advancement Project staff attorney, Donita Judge.

"In particular, the new law requires that 88 county boards of election mail every single registered voter in their purview a non-forwardable notice letter 60 days before the election. Each board must make a list of any bounced letters that are returned as undeliverable. These lists, in turn, are made available as public records to individuals and groups seeking to use the list as a caging list to challenge voters."

"A single returned piece of mail is not a reliable basis for challenging the right to vote," said Judge.

The groups urge Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner to put a halt to such practices: "Partisan, challengers who have obtained a list of returned letters shouldn't be allowed to strip Ohio voters of their right to update their addresses" said Teresa James, attorney with Project Vote. "It is imperative that Secretary Brunner establish guidelines so that partisan challengers will not be permitted to lodge unfounded challenges that clog the election process, burden poll workers and disenfranchise eligible voters."

Quick Links:

Web sites

The Advancement Project

"Issues: Voter Caging." Project Vote.

Reports

Minnitte, Lorraine. "The Politics of Voter Fraud." Project Vote. Mar. 2007.

James, Teresa. "Caging Democracy: A 50 Year History of Partisan Challenges to Minority Voters." Project Vote. Sept. 2007.

In Other News:

Florida to begin enforcing voter registration law - Associated Press
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. -- Florida will begin enforcing new restrictions on voter registration drives after the state won a legal challenge.

Instant gratification: Ohio allowing residents to register and vote for president on same day - Associated Press
COLUMBUS, Ohio - Never mind the last days of the presidential campaign. The busiest days for Barack Obama's campaign in this perennial swing state are likely to be a month before Election Day.

NH, Vt against VA elections policy - Associated Press
White River Junction, Vt. -- Some elections officials in Vermont and New Hampshire have joined 19 of their colleagues in other states in seeking to overturn a new Veterans Affairs policy on voter registration activities in VA facilities.

Join "Sherrod Brown for V.P." group at Obama's website

paper ballots now — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:10:49 -0700

I started a "Sherrod Brown for V.P." group at Obama's website and I welcome others to join the group. I hope this url gets you there:

http://my.barackobama.com/page/group/SherrodBrownforVP

It's disheartening to me to hear that Evan Bayh and Sam Nunn are top contenders as reported by the media. Bayh is a triangulating DLCer and Sam Nunn is a conservative.

Now is the time for progressives to try to influence the Obama campaign to embrace the Zeitgeist.

Sherrod Brown for V.P.

paper ballots now — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:46:56 -0700

Sherrod is an economic populist whose message plays well particularly in the Midwest. Brown would fill the V.P. role well on the campaign trail acting as a bull-dog. In 2004, John Edwards campaigned as VP with a message of hope. Vice Presidents are most effective when not being afraid to throw mud at the opposition.

McSame is likely to choose Romney who made hundreds of million$ buying companies and outsourcing jobs. Brown would hold up very well against Romney in all ways.

Senator Barbara Boxer and Wes Clark ought to be considered too.

Whover Runs this blog is anti-freedom of speech

dabney832 — Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:15:41 -0700

You suck censorship! anti-american communist loser blog!

Hillary's hoodwinking us on health

dianacal — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:38:40 -0700

Or, universal doesn't really mean universal…

Hillary Clinton keeps saying it: universal, universal, universal. Pretty soon people start believing it. That’s how she’s captured the loyalty of voters who want all Americans to have health insurance.

It’s a sound bite, not a solution.

Clinton says her plan will provide universal coverage. It won’t. Mandates rarely achieve universal coverage, and have failed in many states due to escalating costs. The latest case is Massachusetts, where, in a program similar to Clinton’s, half of eligible people have still not enrolled because premiums are unaffordable. Massachusetts residents can now be penalized as much as several thousand dollars for not buying insurance. Meanwhile, the program’s budget is ballooning, and officials fear it may become unsustainable.

Clinton has not said how her mandates would be enforced, but anguishing choices would be inescapable.

Clinton claims Obama would leave 15 million Americans without health care. Many respected analysts believe the number would be far lower with new mechanisms for making care affordable and accessible. In fact, some experts argue that with creative approaches, Obama’s plan might actually leave fewer uninsured than Clinton’s.

Many aspects of Clinton’s plan arouse opposition, including the prospect of the government forcing people to buy insurance they can’t afford, the plan’s reliance on private insurers that are widely mistrusted, and the adequacy of its funding provisions. But the biggest problem is its lack of a serious brake on costs.

Clinton and Obama propose similar cost-control measures, but not the fundamental overhaul many experts recommend. There is growing agreement that only a single payer system, modeled on Medicare, can reign in costs and save billions in administrative expenses.

A plan that mandates universal coverage without controlling costs is doomed – as Massachusetts is discovering. Clinton’s proposal could magnify these problems many-fold. In contrast, Obama’s more modest approach is both fiscally responsible and politically doable.

We mustn’t be hoodwinked by a label and allow Clinton’s insistence on a universal mandate to derail health reform again, as it did back in 1993. Until single payer reforms gain traction, Obama’s plan is the best option.

AP Obtains Memo of Obama Aide's NAFTA Conversation

MacyDayton — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 07:22:04 -0700

By NEDRA PICKLER - Associated Press
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jrFPkleRZmbmPtPxHBGNAPSzfUtwD8V5OLP00

ABC News Nafta Shafta - http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/03/nafta-shafta.html

The memo obtained by the AP was widely distributed within the Canadian government. It is more than 1,300 words and covers many topics that DeMora said were discussed in the Feb. 8 ''introductory meeting'' between himself, Goolsbee and the consul general in Chicago, Georges Rioux.
Goolsbee ''was frank in saying that the primary campaign has been necessarily domestically focused, particularly in the Midwest, and that much of the rhetoric that may be perceived to be protectionist is more reflective of political maneuvering than policy,'' the memo's introduction said. ''On NAFTA, Goolsbee suggested that Obama is less about fundamentally changing the agreement and more in favour of strengthening/clarifying language on labour mobility and environment and trying to establish these as more `core' principles of the agreement.''
Goolsbee said that sentence is true and consistent with Obama's position. But he said other portions of the memo were inaccurate. ... ..
... .. The Canadian memo said that when Rioux ''asked whether we could expect to hear more of this as the elections progressed, Goolsbee thought not. In fact, he mentioned that going forward the Obama camp was going to be careful to send the appropriate message without coming off too protectionist.

=======>OBAMA = "POLITICS AS USUAL"

Strickland Country (Scioto County)

RFORR — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 04:06:34 -0700

Primary politics in Portsmouth and Scioto County, now known as "Strickland Country"

rivervices.blogspot.com

Is this the "OBAMA Buckeye State Blog"?

MacyDayton — Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:33:57 -0700

Are you guys on Obama's campaign payroll? Maybe you should just rename yourselves the "Obama Buckeye State Blog - Pamphleteers of the OBAMA Revolution". Your front and center postings are extremely biased.

Ohio Union Officials have Questions for Obama

MacyDayton — Sun, 02 Mar 2008 09:01:41 -0700

March 1, 2008

Dear Senator Obama:

We were surprised and disappointed to learn that your top economic adviser reportedly had a secret meeting with a representative of the Canadian government where he dismissed your anti-NAFTA rhetoric.

According to Canadian news outlets, your adviser, Austan Goolsbee, told the Canadian Counsel General Georges Rioux that your criticism of NAFTA is "just politics" and should not be taken seriously.

After a series of misdirections and half-truths, it’s time for you to come clean about your campaign’s communications with the Canadian government about NAFTA. Enough with the non-denial denials and the Washington double-speak.

Many Ohioans are concerned about the issue of trade and we want answers to some simple questions:

1) Did you direct your top economic adviser - Austan Goolsbee - to tell the Canadian government that your speeches railing against NAFTA are just political rhetoric? If so, why?

2) Are you aware that Mr. Goolsbee held a secret meeting with the Canadian Counsel General Georges Rioux? Have you spoken with Mr. Goolsbee about that meeting and will you repudiate his comments?

3) Why has Mr. Goolsbee been unwilling to deny that he discussed your positions on NAFTA with Mr. Rioux? Why won't your campaign disclose the full details about that meeting?

4) Given these reports, why should Ohioans believe that you will act on the campaign promises you have made about NAFTA?

5) Sen. Clinton has issued a comprehensive plan to fix NAFTA. Why haven't you done so as well?

The people of Ohio are eager to hear from you - there’s too much at stake.

Sincerely,

Gary Dwyer, Secretary-Treasurer, Ohio State Building and Construction Trades Council

Barry Pickett, Business Representative, Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local 24

STRICKLAND COUNTRY

RFORR — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 18:29:08 -0700

Since 2005, RiverVices.blogspot.com, on the politics of Portsmouth and Sciota County, now known as Strickland Country.

Step Up Ohio

Ron Tank Rotunno — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:37:45 -0700

Dear Ohio Voters:

The women's rights movement in the United states grew with the American Revolution. Abigail Adams and a group of women indicated to the men that their voices weren't being heard. That they had no representation, and it was for that same reason the men took up arms against the British.

After the American Revolution, the women's rights movement lacked leadership and became divided. It wasn't until 1848 that the women's rights crusade picked up steam with the Seneca Falls Convention,under the leadership of Elizabeth Caddy Stanton.She introduced the Declaration of Rights and Sentiments. It read like the Declaration of Independence, and convinced women to stand up for their rights.

The Seneca Falls Convention encouraged a few women from Ohio to be more involved in Women’s equality with men. Elizabeth Bisbee, Frances Dana Gage, and other women organized women's conventions across Ohio. In 1851, Gage led a state conference in Akron, Ohio.To beat back public disapproval of women's rights at this convention, Sojourner Truth, a former slave, gave her acclaimed "Ain't I a Woman?" speech.

Truth spoke of things being out of kilter when there was conversation about peoples rights.She Ploughed, planted, and harvested better than any man on the plantation. And watched her numerous children go off into slavery.Ain't I a Women? Sojourner rebuked man's attitude that women can't have the same rights as men. Truth elaberated on God and how he made women strong to take back the world and make it right.

Women's rights have come a long way since the famous Ain't I a Woman? speech. But there's one more major goal for women's rights activist to achieve: Elect a woman president of the USA.

Ohio can lead the way by standing up and voting for Hillary Clinton! "Ain't I a Woman?"

Thank you.

Ron "Tank" Rotunno

Obama should chose Colin Powell as V.P.

paper ballots now — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:44:55 -0700

Former Edwards supporter here who's leaning Obama but very disappointed that the corporate media, tycoons and the voters of only four small states narrowed the field to two choices. 
 
I'm at Whetstone Library in Columbus the other day and a man asks the librarian if Obama has a campaign office across the street. The librarian doesn't know so I make the mistake of saying yes. The elderly man asks me why anyone would support Obama. I say there's really only two choices but he's capable blah, blah... 
 
The man then says that he plans to get an Barack Hussein Obama yard sign so he can doctor it up to read, "Don't vote for the Muslim." And that Obama's father and stepfather were Muslims and Obama is one too and his mom was an atheist and he went to a madrassa in Indonesia, etc. 
 
I let the guy know that the Constitution states that there should be no religious test for political office but Obama has attended a Christian church for twenty some years and is a Baptized Christian and he should respect that. The guy rejects the fact that Obama is Baptized. 
 
That opened up a can of worms about the website and pastor of Obama's church. Apparently this guy is not bothered by American-Irish people parading through the closed streets of cities across America in a few weeks waving Irish flags. Or by the fact that almost every ethnic group clings to ethnic traditions.

I doubt this guy has ever asked for a Democratic ballot. My point is that Obama better be ready for what's coming. William "The Bloody" Kristol recently suggested that HRC should use fear against Obama. The swiftboaters were ready for HRC but are test marketing how far they can take things against Obama. 
 
Here's my advice to the Obama campaign: 
 
1. Choose a V.P. with a ton of gravitas. Colin Powell blew it by going to the U.N. with phoney docs about WMD in Iraq. But, he's always been a good soldier. He's one person that could persuade most voters to disregard the right wings' smears. He could be more of a figurehead V.P. once in office and this is a way for Powell to redeem himself. I wish I could think of someone else that carries Powell's weight but can't. Ideas? 
 
2. Repeatedly pound the fact that Obama could have left Harvard for millions on Wall Street but chose instead a career in public life. The right-wing is questioning his patriotism now to set up future accusations about his "true" motives. 
 
3. Display Obama's certificate of Baptism on the campaign's website. It's sad that such a move is necessary. But Dems must win this election or McCain and the Supreme Court will truly turn this country into a Banana Republic. 
 
I'll be looking for a check from the Obama campaign for the consulting......

Obama Makes a Shrewd Ad-Buy

paper ballots now — Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:27:46 -0700

This week Obama ads began running on the only Progressive Talk station in the state of Ohio, WVKO 1580 AM, in Columbus. Advertising during Progressive Talk programming is smart. The audience is almost exclusively registered, energized Democratic voters and such ad-buys support content that supports Dems.

Democratic voters put alot of stock in what they hear on Progressive Talk shows with hosts such as Rachel Maddow, Ed Schultz, Stephanie Miller and RFK, Jr.

There have been Democratic Presidential ads from both Obama and Clinton on at least two Clear Channel right-wing stations (that I know of). Why? Why pay for your own swift boating and support stations that force feed people with the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly? Right-wing radio is a major frame creator, and the corporate media mindlessly follows.

Bottom-line: Democratic candidates should battle it out on local stations that Grassroots Dems listen to.....doing so effectively feeds the goose that lays golden eggs.

OBAMA , organizing the big community ! ! circa 1995

davide — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:39:25 -0700

http://www.chicagoreader.com/obama/951208/

What Makes Obama Run?

Lawyer, teacher, philanthropist, and author Barack Obama doesn't need
another career. But he's entering politics to get back to his true
passion--community organization.

By Hank De Zutter
December 8, 1995

When Barack Obama returned to Chicago in 1991 after three brilliant
years at Harvard Law School, he didn't like what he saw. The former
community activist, then 30, had come fresh from a term as president
of the prestigious Harvard Law Review, a position he was the first
African-American to hold. Now he was ready to continue his battle to
organize Chicago's black neighborhoods. But the state of the city
muted his exuberance.

"Upon my return to Chicago," he would write in the epilogue to his
recently published memoir, Dreams From My Father, "I would find the
signs of decay accelerated throughout the South Side--the
neighborhoods shabbier, the children edgier and less restrained, more
middle-class families heading out to the suburbs, the jails bursting
with glowering youth, my brothers without prospects. All too rarely
do I hear people asking just what it is that we've done to make so
many children's hearts so hard, or what collectively we might do to
right their moral compass--what values we must live by. Instead I see
us doing what we've always done--pretending that these children are
somehow not our own."

Today, after three years of law practice and civic activism, Obama
has decided to dive into electoral politics. He is running for the
Illinois Senate, he says, because he wants to help create jobs and a
decent future for those embittered youth. But when he met with some
veteran politicians to tell them of his plans, the only jobs he says
they wanted to talk about were theirs and his. Obama got all sorts of
advice. Some of it perplexed him; most of it annoyed him. One
African-American elected official suggested that Obama change his
name, which he'd inherited from his late Kenyan father. Another told
him to put a picture of his light-bronze, boyish face on all his
campaign materials, "so people don't see your name and think you're
some big dark guy."

Obama, running to be the Democratic candidate for the 13th District
on the south side, was also told--even by fellow progressives--that
he might be too independent, that he should strike a few deals to
assure his election. Another well-meaning adviser suggested never
posing for photos with a glass in his hand--even if he wasn't
drinking alcohol.

"Now all of this may be good political advice," Obama said, "but it's
all so superficial. I am surprised at how many elected
officials--even the good ones--spend so much time talking about the
mechanics of politics and not matters of substance. They have this
poker chip mentality, this overriding interest in retaining their
seats or in moving their careers forward, and the business and game
of politics, the political horse race, is all they talk about. Even
those who are on the same page as me on the issues never seem to want
to talk about them. Politics is regarded as little more than a
career."

Obama doesn't need another career. As a civil rights lawyer, teacher,
philanthropist, and author, he already has no trouble working 12-hour
days. He says he is drawn to politics, despite its superficialities,
as a means to advance his real passion and calling: community
organization.

Obama thinks elected officials could do much to overcome the
political paralysis of the nation's black communities. He thinks they
could lead their communities out of twin culs-de-sac: the unrealistic
politics of integrationist assimilation--which helps a few upwardly
mobile blacks to "move up, get rich, and move out"--and the equally
impractical politics of black rage and black nationalism--which
exhorts but does not organize ordinary folks or create realistic
agendas for change.

Obama, whose political vision was nurtured by his work in the 80s as
an organizer in the far-south-side communities of Roseland and
Altgeld Gardens, proposes a third alternative. Not new to
Chicago--which is the birthplace of community organizing--but unusual
in electoral politics, his proposal calls for organizing ordinary
citizens into bottom-up democracies that create their own strategies,
programs, and campaigns and that forge alliances with other
disaffected Americans. Obama thinks elected officials--even a state
senator--can play a critical catalytic role in this rebuilding.

Obama is certainly not the first candidate to talk about the politics
of community empowerment. His views, for instance, are not that
different from those of the person he would replace, state senator
Alice Palmer, who gave Obama her blessing after deciding to run for
the congressional seat vacated by Mel Reynolds. She promised Obama
that if she lost--which is what happened on November 28--she wouldn't
then run against him to keep her senate seat.

What makes Obama different from other progressive politicians is that
he doesn't just want to create and support progressive programs; he
wants to mobilize the people to create their own. He wants to stand
politics on its head, empowering citizens by bringing together the
churches and businesses and banks, scornful grandmothers and angry
young. Mostly he's running to fill a political and moral vacuum. He
says he's tired of seeing the moral fervor of black folks whipped
up--at the speaker's rostrum and from the pulpit--and then allowed to
dissipate because there's no agenda, no concrete program for change.

While no political opposition to Obama has arisen yet, many have
expressed doubts about the practicality of his ambitions. Obama
himself says he's not certain that his experimental plunge into
electoral politics can produce the kind of community empowerment and
economic change he's after.

"Three major doubts have been raised," he said. The first is whether
in today's political environment--with its emphasis on media and
money--a grass-roots movement can even be created. Will people still
answer the call of participatory politics?

"Second," Obama said, "many believe that the country is too racially
polarized to build the kind of multiracial coalitions necessary to
bring about massive economic change.

"Third, is it possible for those of us working through the Democratic
Party to figure out ways to use the political process to create jobs
for our communities?"

Obama's intriguing candidacy is the latest adventure in a fascinating
life chronicled in Dreams From My Father, published this summer by
Times Books. In Obama's words, the book is "a boy's search for his
father, and through that search a workable meaning for his life as a
black American." In the book, which reads more like a novel than a
memoir, Obama comes to terms with the legacy of the African father
who left his mother and him when he was two, dropped by when he was
ten, and died in an auto accident when he was finishing college.
While doing so, Obama takes readers on a multicultural odyssey
through three continents and several political philosophies. He casts
a skeptical if sympathetic eye on white liberalism, black
nationalism, integration, separatism, small-scale economic
development, and the transient effectiveness of charismatic black
political leaders like the late mayor Washington. While Obama credits
all these political movements with bringing some progress to
middle-class blacks, he believes that none have built enduring
institutions and none have halted the unraveling of black America.

Obama is the product of a brief early-60s college romance and
short-lived marriage between a black African exchange student and a
white liberal Kansan who met at the University of Hawaii. His
critical boyhood years--from two to ten--were spent neither in white
nor black America but in the teeming streets and jungle outskirts of
Djakarta. Obama's boyhood experiences in Indonesia--where his mother
took him when she married another foreign exchange student--propelled
him toward a worldview well beyond his mother's liberalism.

"The poverty, the corruption, the constant scramble for security . .
. remained all around me and bred a relentless skepticism. My
mother's confidence in needlepoint virtues depended on a faith I
didn't possess. . . . In a land where fatalism remained a necessary
tool for enduring hard-ship . . . she was a lonely witness for
secular humanism, a soldier for New Deal, Peace Corps, position-paper
liberalism."

When Obama moved back to his grandparents' home in Hawaii, to attend
the prestigious Punahou School, he encountered race and class
prejudice that would darken his politics even more. At first
embarrassed by his race and African name, he soon bonded with the few
other African-American students. He quickly learned that integration
was a one-way street, with blacks expected to assimilate into a white
world that never gave ground. He participated in bitter bull sessions
with his buddies on the theme of "how white folks will do you."
Obama, who had to reconcile these sentiments with the loving support
he had at home from his white mother and grandparents, dismissed much
of his buddies' analysis as "the same sloppy thinking" used by racist
whites, but he found the racism of whites to be particularly stubborn
and obnoxious.

Obama objected when his Punahou basketball coach upbraided the team
for losing to "a bunch of niggers." Obama writes that the coach
"calmly explained the apparently obvious fact that 'there are black
people, and there are niggers. Those guys were niggers.'"

"That's just how white folks will do you," Obama writes. "It wasn't
merely the cruelty involved; I was learning that black people could
be mean and then some. It was a particular brand of arrogance, an
obtuseness in otherwise sane people that brought forth our bitter
laughter. It was as if whites didn't know they were being cruel in
the first place. Or at least thought you deserving of their scorn."

Obama's politics were tinged with nihilism during his undergraduate
years at Occidental College outside Los Angeles. There he played it
cool and detached, and began to confuse partying and getting high
with rebellion. After he and his buddies joked about the Mexican
cleaning woman's forlorn reaction to the mess they'd created at a
party, Obama was jolted back to reality by the criticism of a fellow
black student, a young Chicago woman. "You think that's funny?" she
told him. "That could have been my grandmother, you know. She had to
clean up behind people for most of her life." Obama later transferred
to Columbia University, where he was shocked by the casual tolerance
of whites and blacks alike for the wide disparity between New York
City's opulence and ghetto poverty. He graduated from Columbia with a
double major in English literature and political science, and a
determination to "organize black folks. At the grass roots." He wrote
scores of letters looking for the right job, and almost a year later
got an offer to come to Chicago. He gave up a job as a financial
writer with an international consulting firm and became a
$1,000-a-month community organizer.

Here in Chicago, Obama worked as lead organizer for the Developing
Communities Project, a campaign funded by south-side Catholic
churches to counteract the dislocation and massive unemployment
caused by the closing and downsizing of southeast Chicago steel
plants.

From 1984 to '88 Obama built an organization in Roseland and the
nearby Altgeld Gardens public housing complex that mobilized hundreds
of citizens. Obama says the campaign experienced "modest successes"
in winning residents a place at the table where a job-training
facility was launched, asbestos and lead paint were negotiated out of
the local schools, and community interests were guarded in the
development of the area's landfills.

Obama left for Harvard in 1988, vowing to return. He excelled at
Harvard Law and gave up an almost certain Supreme Court clerkship to
come back as promised. Here he met and married his wife, Michelle, a
fellow lawyer and activist, joined a law firm headed by Judson Miner,
Mayor Washington's corporation counsel, moved into a lakefront
condominium in Hyde Park, and launched a busy civic life. He sits on
the boards of two foundations with long histories of backing social
and political reform, including his own community work--the Woods
Fund and the Joyce Foundation. Recently he was appointed president of
the board of the Annenberg Challenge Grant, which will distribute
some $50 million in grants to public-school reform efforts.

In 1992 Obama took time off to direct Project Vote, the most
successful grass-roots voter-registration campaign in recent city
history. Credited with helping elect Carol Moseley-Braun to the U.S.
Senate, the registration drive, aimed primarily at African-Americans,
added an estimated 125,000 voters to the voter rolls--even more than
were registered during Harold Washington's mayoral campaigns. "It's a
power thing," said the brochures and radio commercials.

Obama's work on the south side has won him the friendship and respect
of many activists. One of them, Johnnie Owens, left the citywide
advocacy group Friends of the Parks to join Obama at the Developing
Communities Project. He later replaced Obama as its executive
director.

"What I liked about Barack immediately is that he brought a certain
level of sophistication and intelligence to community work," Owens
says. "He had a reasonable, focused approach that I hadn't seen much
of. A lot of organizers you meet these days are these self-anointed
leaders with this strange, way-out approach and unrealistic,
eccentric way of pursuing things from the very beginning. Not Barack.
He's not about calling attention to himself. He's concerned with the
work. It's as if it's his mission in life, his calling, to work for
social justice.

"Anyone who knows me knows that I'm one of the most cynical people
you want to see, always looking for somebody's angle or personal
interest," Owens added. "I've lived in Chicago all my life. I've
known some of the most ruthless and biggest bullshitters out there,
but I see nothing but integrity in this guy."

Jean Rudd, executive director of the Woods Fund, is another person on
guard against self-appointed, self-promoting community leaders. She
admires not only Obama's intelligence but his honesty. "He is one of
the most articulate people I have ever met, but he doesn't use his
gift with language to promote himself. He uses it to clarify the
difficult job before him and before all of us. He's not a promoter;
from the very beginning, he always makes it clear what his
difficulties are. His honesty is refreshing."

Woods was the first foundation to underwrite Obama's work with DCP.
Now that he's on the Woods board, Rudd says, "He is among the most
hard-nosed board members in wanting to see results. He wants to see
our grants make change happen--not just pay salaries."

Another strong supporter of Obama's work--as an organizer, as a
lawyer, and now as a candidate--is Madeline Talbott, lead organizer
of the feisty ACORN community organization, a group that's a thorn in
the side of most elected officials. "I can't repeat what most ACORN
members think and say about politicians. But Barack has proven
himself among our members. He is committed to organizing, to building
a democracy. Above all else, he is a good listener, and we accept and
respect him as a kindred spirit, a fellow organizer."

Obama continues his organizing work largely through classes for
future leaders identified by ACORN and the Centers for New Horizons
on the south side. Conducting a session in a New Horizons classroom,
Obama, tall and thin, looks very much like an Ivy League graduate
student. Dressed casually prep, his tie loosened and his top shirt
button unfastened, he leads eight black women from the Grand
Boulevard community through a discussion of "what folks should know"
about who in Chicago has power and why they have it. It's one of his
favorite topics, and the class bubbles with suggestions about how
"they" got to be high and mighty.

"Slow down now. You're going too fast now," says Obama. "I want to
break this down. We talk 'they, they, they' but don't take the time
to break it down. We don't analyze. Our thinking is sloppy. And to
the degree that it is, we're not going to be able to have the impact
we could have. We can't afford to go out there blind, hollering and
acting the fool, and get to the table and don't know who it is we're
talking to--or what we're going to ask them--whether it's someone
with real power or just a third-string flak catcher."

Later Obama gets to another favorite topic--the lack of collective
action among black churches. "All these churches and all these
pastors are going it alone. And what do we have? These magnificent
palatial churches in the midst of the ruins of some of the most
run-down neighborhoods we'll ever see. All pastors go on thinking
about how they are going to 'build my church,' without joining with
others to try to influence the factors or forces that are destroying
the neighborhoods. They start food pantries and community-service
programs, but until they come together to build something bigger than
an effective church all the community-service programs, all the food
pantries they start will barely take care of even a fraction of the
community's problems."

"In America," Obama says, "we have this strong bias toward individual
action. You know, we idolize the John Wayne hero who comes in to
correct things with both guns blazing. But individual actions,
individual dreams, are not sufficient. We must unite in collective
action, build collective institutions and organizations."

In an interview after the class, Obama again spoke of the need to
organize and mobilize the economic power and moral fervor of black
churches. He also argued that as a state senator he might help bring
this about faster than as a community organizer or civil rights
lawyer.

"What we need in America, especially in the African-American
community, is a moral agenda that is tied to a concrete agenda for
building and rebuilding our communities," he said. "We have moved
beyond the clarion call stage that was needed during the civil rights
movement. Now, like Nelson Mandela in South Africa, we must move into
a building stage. We must invest our energy and resources in a
massive rebuilding effort and invent new mechanisms to strengthen and
hasten this community-building effort.

"We have no shortage of moral fervor," said Obama. "We have some
wonderful preachers in town--preachers who continue to inspire
me--preachers who are magnificent at articulating a vision of the
world as it should be. In every church on Sunday in the
African-American community we have this moral fervor; we have energy
to burn.

"But as soon as church lets out, the energy dissipates. We must find
ways to channel all this energy into community building. The biggest
failure of the civil rights movement was in failing to translate this
energy, this moral fervor, into creating lasting institutions and
organizational structures."

Obama added that as important and inspiring as it was, the Washington
administration also let an opportunity go by. "Washington was the
best of the classic politicians," Obama said. "He knew his
constituency; he truly enjoyed people. That can't be said for a lot
of politicians. He was not cynical about democracy and the democratic
process--as so many of them are. But he, like all politicians, was
primarily interested in maintaining his power and working the levers
of power.

"He was a classic charismatic leader," Obama said, "and when he died
all of that dissipated. This potentially powerful collective spirit
that went into supporting him was never translated into clear
principles, or into an articulable agenda for community change.

"The only principle that came through was 'getting our fair share,'
and this runs itself out rather quickly if you don't make it
concrete. How do we rebuild our schools? How do we rebuild our
communities? How do we create safer streets? What concretely can we
do together to achieve these goals? When Harold died, everyone
claimed the mantle of his vision and went off in different
directions. All that power dissipated.

"Now an agenda for getting our fair share is vital. But to work, it
can't see voters or communities as consumers, as mere recipients or
beneficiaries of this change. It's time for politicians and other
leaders to take the next step and to see voters, residents, or
citizens as producers of this change. The thrust of our organizing
must be on how to make them productive, how to make them employable,
how to build our human capital, how to create businesses,
institutions, banks, safe public spaces--the whole agenda of creating
productive communities. That is where our future lies.

"The right wing talks about this but they keep appealing to that old
individualistic bootstrap myth: get a job, get rich, and get out.
Instead of investing in our neighborhoods, that's what has always
happened. Our goal must be to help people get a sense of building
something larger.

"The political debate is now so skewed, so limited, so distorted,"
said Obama. "People are hungry for community; they miss it. They are
hungry for change.

"What if a politician were to see his job as that of an organizer,"
he wondered, "as part teacher and part advocate, one who does not
sell voters short but who educates them about the real choices before
them? As an elected public official, for instance, I could bring
church and community leaders together easier than I could as a
community organizer or lawyer. We would come together to form
concrete economic development strategies, take advantage of existing
laws and structures, and create bridges and bonds within all sectors
of the community. We must form grass-root structures that would hold
me and other elected officials more accountable for their actions.

"The right wing, the Christian right, has done a good job of building
these organizations of accountability, much better than the left or
progressive forces have. But it's always easier to organize around
intolerance, narrow-mindedness, and false nostalgia. And they also
have hijacked the higher moral ground with this language of family
values and moral responsibility.

"Now we have to take this same language--these same values that are
encouraged within our families--of looking out for one another, of
sharing, of sacrificing for each other--and apply them to a larger
society. Let's talk about creating a society, not just individual
families, based on these values. Right now we have a society that
talks about the irresponsibility of teens getting pregnant, not the
irresponsibility of a society that fails to educate them to aspire
for more."

Obama said he's not at all comfortable with the political game of
getting and staying elected, of raising money in backroom deals and
manipulating an electable image.

"I am also finding people equivocating on their support. I'm talking
about progressive politicians who are on the same page with me on the
issues but who warn me I may be too independent."

Although Obama has built strong relationships with people inside
Mayor Daley's administration, he has not asked for their support in
his campaign. Nor has he sought the mayor's endorsement.

"I want to do this as much as I can from the grass-roots level,
raising as much money for the campaign as possible at coffees,
connecting directly with voters," said Obama. "But to organize this
district I must get known. And this costs money. I admit that in this
transitional period, before I'm known in the district, I'm going to
have to rely on some contributions from wealthy people--people who
like my ideas but who won't attach strings. This is not ideal, but it
is a problem encountered by everyone in their first campaign.

"Once elected, once I'm known, I won't need that kind of money, just
as Harold Washington, once he was elected and known, did not need to
raise and spend money to get the black vote."

Obama took time off from attending campaign coffees to attend
October's Million Man March in Washington, D.C. His experiences there
only reinforced his reasons for jumping into politics.

"What I saw was a powerful demonstration of an impulse and need for
African-American men to come together to recognize each other and
affirm our rightful place in the society," he said. "There was a
profound sense that African-American men were ready to make a
commitment to bring about change in our communities and lives.

"But what was lacking among march organizers was a positive agenda, a
coherent agenda for change. Without this agenda a lot of this energy
is going to dissipate. Just as holding hands and singing 'We shall
overcome' is not going to do it, exhorting youth to have pride in
their race, give up drugs and crime, is not going to do it if we
can't find jobs and futures for the 50 percent of black youth who are
unemployed, underemployed, and full of bitterness and rage.

"Exhortations are not enough, nor are the notions that we can create
a black economy within America that is hermetically sealed from the
rest of the economy and seriously tackle the major issues confronting
us," Obama said.

"Any solution to our unemployment catastrophe must arise from us
working creatively within a multicultural, interdependent, and
international economy. Any African-Americans who are only talking
about racism as a barrier to our success are seriously misled if they
don't also come to grips with the larger economic forces that are
creating economic insecurity for all workers--whites, Latinos, and
Asians. We must deal with the forces that are depressing wages,
lopping off people's benefits right and left, and creating an
earnings gap between CEOs and the lowest-paid worker that has risen
in the last 20 years from a ratio of 10 to 1 to one of better than
100 to 1.

"This doesn't suggest that the need to look inward emphasized by the
march isn't important, and that these African-American tribal
affinities aren't legitimate. These are mean, cruel times,
exemplified by a 'lock 'em up, take no prisoners' mentality that
dominates the Republican-led Congress. Historically,
African-Americans have turned inward and towards black nationalism
whenever they have a sense, as we do now, that the mainstream has
rebuffed us, and that white Americans couldn't care less about the
profound problems African-Americans are facing."

"But cursing out white folks is not going to get the job done.
Anti-Semitic and anti-Asian statements are not going to lift us up.
We've got some hard nuts-and-bolts organizing and planning to do.
We've got communities to build."

Why Barack Obama ?

davide — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:14:56 -0700

Barack Obama burst onto the national political scene with a memorable speech at the 2004 Democratic convention. Anybody that watched this speech realized Barack Obama is a very gifted young man and talented orator. Obama is a Christian (contrary to the small minds attempting to arouse suspicion) from a bi- racial family. His mother is white his father was black. His dad left when he was very young.

We all realize that it takes more than being an intelligent person that is able to inspire people through the spoken word to be an effective President. , So why is it time to elect Barack Obama ?

Barack Obama will unify our country and be a very effective agent for change. He has the ability to garner support from all factions of the American political process. Our country is in the midst of a very critical period. The last thing we need is more political deadlock based on partisan politics. I respect Hillary Clinton as a great American that has accomplished much in her life. The fact is that Hillary Clinton is despised by many Americans and crucified on daily talk shows across this country. They love to point out her personal and political baggage. It is feared that many, formerly apathetic, Republican, ultra-right wing, voters will be motivated to counter her bid. Very frequently, Barack Obama is receiving meaningful endorsements and gleaning support from Republican and Democratic leaders alike.

Many people bring up the " experience" question. They believe that Barack Obama will be President one day but lacks the experience at this time. This is a fallacy. The President of the United States has access to the best minds in the country; experts in every field possible are available to the President .It is obvious that, with all their experience, Chris Dodd and Joe Biden, didn’t fare well in early primaries. They were the most experienced candidates on the stage. The President needs to be able to absorb all the information that he can and make decisions. You can hire experience, you can’t hire good judgment. Judgment is a much more critical attribute. Barack Obama illustrated his judgment when he opposed the war in Iraq. He is not anti -war; he is "anti-dumb war "

http://www.youtube.com/v/AUV69LZbCNQ&rel=1

Iraq has cost thousands of lives and billions of dollars. We have accomplished nothing and we are struggling and consuming more American assets just to reach a pre war level of peace.

Barack Obama graduated from Columbia University, where he majored in political science and specialized in international relations. He then attended Harvard Law School where he was elected President of Harvard Law Review. He graduated at the top of the class. Barack Obama will respect the Constitution of the United States. He will not ignore it when it seems convenient.

The current administration has cost our country valuable credibility with allies and non-allies around the world. Credibility is the key to our National Security. We need the trust, respect and cooperation, of other nations in order to prevail against the radical Jihadists .Barack Obama has promised to reach out mend strained relations and read "the riot act” to would be aggressors.

Why Barack Obama ? No other candidate has the ability to communicate and mediate critical discussion between opposing parties. No other candidate has the support of a massive and diverse coalition of people from all faiths, races, genders, political parties or orientation. He does not appeal to the radical elements of any group, he appeals to the centrists among them. Why Barack Obama ? Because its time for GENUINE change!