Asian Prostitutes and Panda Sex on Blackwell Blog
Yeah, you read that right. Ken Blackwell has officially gone off the deep end

These people are nuts. At some point they must start to become embarrassed for themselves, lord knows they are embarrassing Ohio with this garbage.
That
"Do people really read these
"Do people really read these things?�� I mean, other than those of us here who laugh at them?"
Lol, no.
---------------------
Name - Mikguires
Email - mikiguires[at]gmail.com
AIM - mgm1980
Yahoo - mgm1980
Start a Petition
Actually, what I think is
I'll grant that its idiotic
If Kenny were to become governor
Any polling data out there?
It's been a long time since we've gotten any fresh polling data. Is there any news out there?
...
NIH Peer-Review Controversy: During consideration of the FY 2004 L/HHS/Education appropriations bill on the House floor an amendment offered by Rep. Pat Toomey (R-PA) to prohibit the NIH from funding five specific research grants was narrowly defeated, 210-212.  The amendment challenged the peer review process at the NIH and required that funding for these grants, including three of the five that were sexual health-related research grants, be redirected toward other research, such as heart disease or cancer. In anticipation of possible Senate consideration of a similar amendment, the Academy joined with over 145 others in the research community - including ACOG, AAFP, AAMC - in a sign-on letter supporting the NIH's merit review process. Fortunately, the Senate did not take up this amendment during its floor deliberations. However, this issue is far from over.  Following an October joint House/Senate hearing, NIH Director, Dr. Elias Zerhouni, has been asked to provide a response to several questions submitted by Congress on almost 150 grants that were deemed questionable by some members of Congress.
The several congressional committees are considering holding hearings on NIH in general and possibly this issue in particular during the second session of the 108th Congress.  The pediatric academic societies joined the AAP in sending its own letter supporting the peer review process to Congress in December.  At the AMA interim meeting in early December, the House of Delegates approved a resolution supporting the NIH peer review process and recommended its support be conveyed to Congress.





Wow...