Grow some
This really shouldn't need reiterating after the events of the last few years, but it seems it needs to be. Checking out Leftyblogs this AM, I happened upon this post by LisaRenee at Glass City Jungle
Yes, it’s true, that is one of added benefits of being a woman political blogger. The simple physical reality is, I have no balls. I like Eric, and I have watched enough of the exchanges between some of the blogs on the left and some of the blogs on the right at time get nasty. I’ve learned it’s typically better to ignore it and just try to move on to issues I think are more important.
Emphasis mine.
I don't know where LisaRenee learned that, but it is in stark contrast to what I have learned over the last few years. John Kerry. Swift boat. End of story.
There is a pugilistic aspect to politics. Toughness counts. Standing up for yourself counts. Ignoring something doesn't make it go away - see Warming, global - as an example.
I understand that Democrats and specifically liberal Democrats would prefer to talk about "issues" than engage in the rest of the political playground, but one would have thought that so close after the recent election some lessons would have stuck around for at least a month.
I started blogging to inject some spine (and what I hope is reasoned common sense) into the debate on our side, and counter some of the utter ridiculousness on the right. I'm glad there are folks like Eric doing the same.
For me, to suggest disarming is unacceptable.
Let's be clear what this charity boxing challenge issue is really all about. It's about a kid who likes to throw around rhetoric and epithets that he doesn't have the guts (or balls) to back up. Whether it's something as silly as name calling of a blogger, or more serious war boosting while being a chickenhawk chicken shit letting some other youngsters do the dying for him.
We all know Matt Naugle is a kooky fringe activist, but I don't think it hurts pointing that out to everyone once in a while, because as LisaRenee demonstrates, some people do have short memories.





Cross Commented
cross comment from LisaRenee's thread. My last word on the issue:
LR, much love and respect. You know this. I completely agree that it is silly and there are, uh, much more important things to both talk about and work on. I’m currently doing that. If you think my hippie buddhist ass wants to solve everything by fighting you’d be wrong. I’ve walked away from more than I’ve talked myself out of - and talked myself out of more than I’ve been in.
The point was to call Matt out and show true colors. I think that was accomplished. I’m not going to back down from these coward bullies at any step in the game. It was something I decided to do long ago before I “stepped in the ring” of the Ohio blogosphere.
I don’t much like name calling either, but when someone starts the narrative that liberal men have to be pansies because they are not tough hard ass conservatives who support illegal wars and have never cried a day in their life, well, I’ve got a problem with that. A big problem. Fact is I cry quite a bit, as I’m sure Matt does. I know this recent election brought some tears. Difference is I’m able to admit it and not suffer fatal blows to my manhood.
Silly? Yes. More important things? Yes. Proved a point needing to be made? Yes. The silence on the part of the brash young conservative blowhard was deafening. The point I wanted to make is that the talking point that liberals being pansy ass tree huggers with no backbone who want to cut and run is false. Todd makes a point which misses the central one. Of course this is silly and mostly unimportant on the face of it. But underneath it all it proves a point that (I felt anyway) needed to be made.
So we can now return to bashing them with facts and retire the Ali rhetoric. But know this when you challenge our integrity and willingness to back our talk: we ain’t backing’ down bitches! (at least not this hippie buddhist freak). Ya’ll have a nice day.
Eric VesselsOnline Director
Progress Ohio - Powered By You!
www.progressohio.org