It is refreshing, but . . .

Marwood — Thu, 15 May 2008 09:07:50 -0700

It makes you wonder how the Vindicator's editorial board was missing what most of the rest of us saw.

Youngstown Vindicator recants and agrees impeachment was appropriate (sorry PD)

modernesquire — Thu, 15 May 2008 05:34:30 -0700

In today's editorial, the Youngstown Vindicator discusses why a majority of its board decided to write the editorial which called for Dann to be given another chance. After the events of this week (pre-resignation), the Vindicator recants.

In a May 2 editorial board meeting, Dann explained many of the accusations against him to the satisfaction of a majority of the editors attending. We took Dann on his word that he had provided full disclosure of what went on in his office.
It is now safe to assume that Dann does not hold the honor of elective office and the sanctity of the vote in the same high esteem that we do. Further, Dann must know that he committed offenses that warrant his removal, if not by resignation, by impeachment.

It's refreshing to see one of Ohio's dailies admit when they were wrong.

Buckeye State Blog - Youngstown Vindicator recants and agrees impeachment was appropriate (sorry PD) - Comments

It is refreshing, but . . .

Youngstown Vindicator recants and agrees impeachment was appropriate (sorry PD)