<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.buckeyestateblog.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Buckeye State Blog - Did RAB&amp;#039;s Naugle get the word to shut it? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.buckeyestateblog.com/did_rabs_naugle_get_the_word_to_shut_it</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Did RAB&#039;s Naugle get the word to shut it?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Did RAB&#039;s Naugle get the word to shut it?</title>
 <link>http://www.buckeyestateblog.com/did_rabs_naugle_get_the_word_to_shut_it</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/06/22/oh-where-oh-where-has-our-little-matt-gone/&quot;&gt;Eric at Plunderbund thinks so&lt;/a&gt;, and I tend to agree with him. It would make perfect sense that the ORP or the Todd campaign is leaning on him to keep quiet. If he were allowed to keep up his nasty Frankie Coleman posts, he would continue to do significant damage to Bill Todd and the gang. It looks like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dispatch.com/dispatch/content/editorials/stories/2007/06/17/frank.ART_ART_06-17-07_G4_Q871686.html&quot;&gt;Dispatch&amp;#39;s editorial rebuke&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dispatch.com/dispatch/content/editorials/stories/2007/06/17/hallett17.ART_ART_06-17-07_G5_FL718B9.html&quot;&gt;Joe Hallet&amp;#39;s column that called Matt out&lt;/a&gt; on his gutter posting did have some affect in GOP circles. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although, I wouldn&amp;#39;t expect it to last. They&amp;#39;ll be back and nastier than ever before too long. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.buckeyestateblog.com/did_rabs_naugle_get_the_word_to_shut_it#comment</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:13:44 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>2010 Buckeye</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5466 at http://www.buckeyestateblog.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
