<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.buckeyestateblog.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Buckeye State Blog - Judge&amp;#039;s Ruling Ends Wiretapping Program - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.buckeyestateblog.com/node/2402</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Judge&#039;s Ruling Ends Wiretapping Program&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Judge&#039;s Ruling Ends Wiretapping Program</title>
 <link>http://www.buckeyestateblog.com/node/2402</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Biggest news of the day. DeWine wrote a bill to try and make this legal - expect the Brown press release any time now - staff&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Judge Anna Diggs Taylor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060817.wtaps0817/BNStory/International/home&quot;&gt;ruled today&lt;/a&gt; that the NSA warrentless wire tapping program was unconstitutional and ordered the program&amp;#39;s imediate halt.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U. S. District Court judge struck down the program due to the goverment&amp;#39;s violation of key constitional rights, such as free speach, privacy and the separation of powers. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; ‚ÄúPlaintiffs have prevailed, and the public interest is clear, in this matter. It is the upholding of our Constitution,‚Äù Judge Taylor wrote in her 43-page opinion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_9345.shtml&quot;&gt;Capitol Hill Blue&lt;/a&gt; &amp;quot;&lt;font face=&quot;Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;The government argued that the program is well within the president&amp;#39;s authority, but said proving that would require revealing state secrets.&amp;quot;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; I remember using that logic when I was nine.  &amp;quot;I could show you my invisable flying machine,  but than it wouldn&amp;#39;t work anymore.&amp;quot;  The Bush administration got caught with thier hands in the cookie jar. Now we just have to wait and see if they actually pay attention to this ruling or continue to flout the rule of law as he has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/08/02/BL2006080200815.html&quot;&gt;in other cases&lt;/a&gt; where the constition is involved. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.buckeyestateblog.com/node/2402#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.buckeyestateblog.com/taxonomy/term/48">News of the Day</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:14:54 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>redenemy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2402 at http://www.buckeyestateblog.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
