Bill Todd's worst enemy is ... Bill Todd.

Does he not realize that people keep track of these things?!?

Bill Todd today (HT: RAB): Bill Todd Slams Mayor Coleman over Plan to Take Over City Center

"Unfortunately, the first action by our drowsy mayor was an overreaction! Filing an ill-considered lawsuit against the nation’s largest shopping center developer is hardly an act of mature, responsible leadership.

“We need considered judgment and a plan for addressing the blighted area formerly known as the City Center Mall. Burning bridges with Simon Property Group is not smart. We should expect more from our mayor than a knee-jerk reaction. . .

"The only thing Mike Coleman accomplished with this political stunt is to make Columbus look unprofessional and anti-business."

Now that's over Mayor Coleman's plan to declare the manager of the property in default of its lease so new management that isn't an absentee landlord can come in and start to redevelop the City Center property. 

Here's what Bill Todd was saying about the City Center back in May (HT: RAB): Bill Todd: "Tear down this Mall!" (w/video goodness!)  and as covered by the Columbus Dispatch:

"Mr. Mayor, tear down this mall," Todd said.

Todd offered no specifics for his City Center plan beyond saying he thinks the mall should remain an entertainment and shopping area. He said he meant "tear down" rhetorically; his plan won't necessarily include razing City Center.

He also said he'd move to seize control of the mall through eminent domain, if need be. City Center's land is owned by the city-created Capitol South Urban Redevelopment Corp., and the mall is owned by Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group.

So, let's get this straight, when a Democratic elected official decides to replace an absentee landlord of a major commerical property project by going to court and declaring that landlord in default so the city can replace the landlord with new developers, that's heavy-handed, and anti-business.   But when a Republican candidate, on the same issue, proposes a more radical plan and instead have the government seize that property by eminent domain (sounds like Kelo to me!), that's neither heavy-handed or anti-business?

Seriously, does Bill Todd think that nobody is going to call him out on this?!?